E-Bike Safety Takes More Than Regulation
E-bikes are changing how people travel in our communities. Research suggests nearly half of e-bike commute trips replace car trips. Those replaced trips average 9.3 miles, more than three times the length of the typical bike trip in the US. Together, these findings point to a real opportunity: e-bikes can reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by shifting more trips from cars to bicycles, including longer-distance trips that might otherwise be difficult to make on a conventional bike.
But as e-bike use grows for riders of all ages, much of the conversation has focused on regulating the devices themselves.
In a September 2026 ITE Journal article, “Designing for the E-Bike Era: Applying the Safe System Approach to an Evolving Transportation Network,” the authors examine how federal, state, and local regulations govern e-bikes and why regulation alone cannot eliminate transportation risk. Applying the Safe System Approach means recognizing that people make mistakes and it is our responsibility to design transportation systems that anticipate human error and reduce the likelihood and severity of crashes.
This is the premise behind our Safety Multipliers work: combining interventions that reduce exposure, severity, and likelihood to achieve greater safety outcomes than any one strategy delivers alone.
The article compares three approaches jurisdictions can take to e-bike safety:
- Pairing device regulations with investments in a connected, low-stress network
- Regulating devices without improving the network
- Banning e-bikes altogether
Each approach has different outcomes. Adopting policy that only focuses on regulating devices may leave the conditions that make riding uncomfortable or unsafe unchanged. Restricting e-bikes has its own downside. Since research shows they can replace car trips, a ban may mean missing a chance to reduce transportation risk more broadly.
E-bikes offer communities an opportunity to expand mobility and reduce automobile travel. But that depends on more than deciding which devices belong on the road. Communities also need low-stress networks and policies that support safer travel for everyone.
Contact us to discuss how these approaches could inform e-bike safety decisions in your community.
share this article
Connect with our Contributor
Explore More
Meeting the Deadline Isn’t the Same as Solving the Problem
New state requirements are changing how cities approach truck route planning, but meeting a deadline doesn’t necessarily resolve conflicts between freight movement and neighborhood needs. See how Jurupa Valley used truck data, community input, and clear evaluation criteria to rethink its truck network, meet California’s AB 98 requirements, and reduce truck traffic exposure in sensitive areas.
Cathleen Sullivan Joins Fehr & Peers
Our new Principal Cathleen Sullivan brings a practical, people-centered approach to transit and multimodal planning, helping Bay Area agencies turn complex ideas into progress.
Intern Perspectives: A Summer in Transportation
What does a transportation internship actually look like? This summer, 25 interns across 14 of our offices gained hands-on experience with fieldwork, street design, GIS, data analysis, visual communication, client work, and community engagement. See what they learned, what surprised them, and how the experience shaped the way they think about careers in transportation.




