E-Bike Safety Takes More Than Regulation

 

A September 2026 ITE Journal article applies the Safe System Approach to e-bike safety.
November 11, 2026 • 2 minute read
Resource blog article on E-Bikes and the Safe System Approach

E-Bike Safety Takes More Than Regulation

 

A September 2026 ITE Journal article applies the Safe System Approach to e-bike safety.
November 11, 2026 • 2 minute read

E-bikes are changing how people travel in our communities. Research suggests nearly half of e-bike commute trips replace car trips. Those replaced trips average 9.3 miles, more than three times the length of the typical bike trip in the US. Together, these findings point to a real opportunity: e-bikes can reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by shifting more trips from cars to bicycles, including longer-distance trips that might otherwise be difficult to make on a conventional bike.

But as e-bike use grows for riders of all ages, much of the conversation has focused on regulating the devices themselves.

In a September 2026 ITE Journal article, “Designing for the E-Bike Era: Applying the Safe System Approach to an Evolving Transportation Network,” the authors examine how federal, state, and local regulations govern e-bikes and why regulation alone cannot eliminate transportation risk. Applying the Safe System Approach means recognizing that people make mistakes and it is our responsibility to design transportation systems that anticipate human error and reduce the likelihood and severity of crashes.

This is the premise behind our Safety Multipliers work: combining interventions that reduce exposure, severity, and likelihood to achieve greater safety outcomes than any one strategy delivers alone.

The article compares three approaches jurisdictions can take to e-bike safety:

  • Pairing device regulations with investments in a connected, low-stress network
  • Regulating devices without improving the network
  • Banning e-bikes altogether

Each approach has different outcomes. Adopting policy that only focuses on regulating devices may leave the conditions that make riding uncomfortable or unsafe unchanged. Restricting e-bikes has its own downside. Since research shows they can replace car trips, a ban may mean missing a chance to reduce transportation risk more broadly.

E-bikes offer communities an opportunity to expand mobility and reduce automobile travel. But that depends on more than deciding which devices belong on the road. Communities also need low-stress networks and policies that support safer travel for everyone.

Contact us to discuss how these approaches could inform e-bike safety decisions in your community.

share this article

Connect with our Contributor

Staff photo of Angelica Rocha

Angelica Rocha

Associate

Email Me

Explore More

Driving Less Starts with Building Differently

Driving Less Starts with Building Differently

How much can planning decisions actually reduce driving? Our latest research introduces a statistical model that links built environment choices—such as density, transit service, walkability, and land use mix—to vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The findings give planners and policymakers practical, evidence-based tools to evaluate scenarios, understand tradeoffs, and make more informed transportation and land use decisions.

Navigating VMT Under CEQA

Navigating VMT Under CEQA

VMT under CEQA continues to evolve as agencies, practitioners, and decision makers work through analysis methods, mitigation feasibility, and defensible evidence. Our new Q&A resource offers practical answers on vehicle miles traveled, SB 743, mitigation program design, implementation, administration, and legal and strategic considerations.

Demand Management Is Injury Prevention

Demand Management Is Injury Prevention

New research shows that reducing driving exposure may be one of the most powerful safety strategies available. The findings connect VMT, mode share, and travel time to fatality rates, reframing demand management as injury prevention.