Street Safety in an Autonomous Vehicle Future
Street Safety in an Autonomous Vehicle Future
In contrast to more traditional roadway safety approaches, the Safe System approach strives to design and operate our vehicles and infrastructure in a manner that anticipates human error and accommodates human injury tolerances with a goal of eliminating fatal and serious injuries. By automating vehicle speed regulation, improving reaction times, and reducing or eliminating the incidence of distracted and/or impaired driving, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to support several core elements of the Safe System approach. However, recent trends in traffic-related pedestrian deaths and speeding-related collisions raise increasing concerns and a need for transportation professionals to work with policymakers and vehicle companies toward policy, legislation, and vehicle/software design that create safe AVs—and safe streets to operate them on.
As a direct result of these alarming trends and uncertainty regarding the potential impacts of AVs on safety outcomes, Fehr & Peers partnered with ITE to publish “Autonomous Vehicle Considerations under a Safe System Framework,” which provides a concise summary of potential AV benefits, risks, and other considerations within the Safe System framework. For a more detailed look at street safety considerations for an AV future, we invite you to explore the ITE “Quick Bite.” The article highlights how transportation engineers and planners can design roadways taking “evergreen” safety principles into account, both for today and in the future.
share this article
Explore More
Wildfire Evacuation & CEQA: A Checklist for Navigating Impacts
Check out the discussion draft screening checklist for wildfire evacuation impacts and navigating CEQA.
Celebrating Innovations from Our R&D Teams
Check out these examples of R&D innovations that are helping clients respond to changing transportation needs.
Transforming Transit Access
Considering pursuing a Bay Area MTC station access grant or conducting a gap analysis for MTC’s Transit Oriented Communities policy? Check out three access plans highlighted by MTC as examples to follow.




