Street Safety in an Autonomous Vehicle Future

 

Merging Autonomous Vehicles into the Safe System Approach
October 8, 2021
First page of Autonomous Vehicle Considerations under the Safe System Approach ITE report

Street Safety in an Autonomous Vehicle Future

 

Merging Autonomous Vehicles into the Safe System Approach
October 8, 2021

In contrast to more traditional roadway safety approaches, the Safe System approach strives to design and operate our vehicles and infrastructure in a manner that anticipates human error and accommodates human injury tolerances with a goal of eliminating fatal and serious injuries. By automating vehicle speed regulation, improving reaction times, and reducing or eliminating the incidence of distracted and/or impaired driving, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to support several core elements of the Safe System approach. However, recent trends in traffic-related pedestrian deaths and speeding-related collisions raise increasing concerns and a need for transportation professionals to work with policymakers and vehicle companies toward policy, legislation, and vehicle/software design that create safe AVs—and safe streets to operate them on.

As a direct result of these alarming trends and uncertainty regarding the potential impacts of AVs on safety outcomes, Fehr & Peers partnered with ITE to publish “Autonomous Vehicle Considerations under a Safe System Framework,” which provides a concise summary of potential AV benefits, risks, and other considerations within the Safe System framework. For a more detailed look at street safety considerations for an AV future, we invite you to explore the ITE “Quick Bite.” The article highlights how transportation engineers and planners can design roadways taking “evergreen” safety principles into account, both for today and in the future.

share this article

Explore More

What Hydrofoil Service Could Look Like in Washington, DC

What Hydrofoil Service Could Look Like in Washington, DC

Could electric hydrofoils offer a faster way to travel between waterfront neighborhoods in Washington, DC? Our feasibility study found potential ridership demand and tested how routes, fares, and service frequency could shape a future pilot. The approach also offers a way for other communities to evaluate emerging transportation ideas before committing significant resources.

A Unified Framework for Roadway Safety

A Unified Framework for Roadway Safety

How can transportation professionals determine which safety strategies to prioritize? The Unified Framework for Safe System Implementation brings decades of safety research together to help agencies make more informed decisions. By connecting exposure, severity, and crash likelihood to different roadway contexts, the framework offers a practical way to prioritize strategies across planning, policy, design, and operations.

Meeting the Deadline Isn’t the Same as Solving the Problem

Meeting the Deadline Isn’t the Same as Solving the Problem

New state requirements are changing how cities approach truck route planning, but meeting a deadline doesn’t necessarily resolve conflicts between freight movement and neighborhood needs. See how Jurupa Valley used truck data, community input, and clear evaluation criteria to rethink its truck network, meet California’s AB 98 requirements, and reduce truck traffic exposure in sensitive areas.