Rethinking Street Design for Safety and Emergency Access
Rethinking Street Design for Safety and Emergency Access
Cities want neighborhood streets that are safe, livable, and ready for emergencies. But in practice, those priorities don’t always align. Rigid standards and siloed decision-making can push communities toward wider streets that increase speeds, raise long-term costs, and limit space for housing and neighborhood amenities.
This February 2026 ITE Journal article, “Safer Streets Through Abundance: Aligning Fire Codes, Safety, and Community Goals,” looks at a different path forward: connected street networks that give emergency responders multiple routes, and early collaboration between fire, transportation, planning, and public health teams.
When departments work together from the start, communities can move beyond one-size-fits-all standards and design residential streets that support both emergency response and everyday safety.
Contact us to explore how your community can balance emergency access with safer, more sustainable neighborhood design.
share this article
Contributor
Matt Goyne
Principal
Email Me
Explore More
Demand Management Is Injury Prevention
New research shows that reducing driving exposure may be one of the most powerful safety strategies available. The findings connect VMT, mode share, and travel time to fatality rates, reframing demand management as injury prevention.
Announcing Safety Multipliers
What do San Francisco’s Van Ness BRT, New York’s congestion pricing, and Arlington’s intersection program have in common? Each pulls all three Safe System levers at once. We call that pattern a safety multiplier.
The City That Knows How to Say Yes
What does it take for a city to say “yes” without giving up control? This perspective argues for a conditional, public-minded yes, one grounded in clear standards, evidence, and measurable outcomes, with AVs as one example of a much broader governance challenge.





