Rethinking Street Design for Safety and Emergency Access
Rethinking Street Design for Safety and Emergency Access
Cities want neighborhood streets that are safe, livable, and ready for emergencies. But in practice, those priorities don’t always align. Rigid standards and siloed decision-making can push communities toward wider streets that increase speeds, raise long-term costs, and limit space for housing and neighborhood amenities.
This February 2026 ITE Journal article, “Safer Streets Through Abundance: Aligning Fire Codes, Safety, and Community Goals,” looks at a different path forward: connected street networks that give emergency responders multiple routes, and early collaboration between fire, transportation, planning, and public health teams.
When departments work together from the start, communities can move beyond one-size-fits-all standards and design residential streets that support both emergency response and everyday safety.
Contact us to explore how your community can balance emergency access with safer, more sustainable neighborhood design.
share this article
Contributor
Matt Goyne
Principal
Email Me
Explore More
Help Shape a Generative AI Policy Starter Kit for Transportation Organizations
We’re developing a Generative AI Policy Starter Kit with ITE’s AI Great Ideas Group. If you’re creating AI guidance now, share one question or sample policy snippet to help shape the resource.
VMT Mitigation Lexicon
If you’ve ever paused mid-CEQA draft to ask “what do we mean by this, exactly?”, our new VMT Mitigation Lexicon is for you.
What Is Downtown DC For?
The DC decongestion pricing study landed years late in a city that looks nothing like the one it studied. What is the debate really about?




