The Ws of Safety: Treating the System, Not the Symptom
The Ws of Safety: Treating the System, Not the Symptom
The US is entering its second decade of Vision Zero, a road safety initiative designed to eliminate all traffic-related deaths and serious injuries. But the conversation has evolved.
For years, transportation professionals relied on the traditional Es of safety—engineering, education, enforcement, and emergency services. These reactive measures, while important, often operate in silos and miss the bigger picture of how transportation systems as a whole can reduce risk.
A new article in the Transportation Research Record (TRR), authored by several of our safety experts, shifts the focus from Es to the Ws—asking who, what, when, where, and why. The Ws of Safety framework can help uncover systemic risks and guide upstream interventions on the road to Vision Zero.
For transportation planners, engineers, and public agencies, the takeaway is clear: Vision Zero 2.0 requires more than refining the old tools. It calls for embedding the Safe System Approach into everyday practice and addressing systemic issues to shape roadway safety long before a crash occurs.
The Ws of Safety can help us achieve these goals.
Read Getting a “W” for Safety: Flipping the Script on the Safety “E”s in Search of a Winning Strategy:
share this article
Contributors
Meghan Mitman
Regional Principal-in-Charge
Email Me
Terence Zhao
Senior Transportation Planner
Email Me
Adrian Engel
Principal
Email Me
Explore More
A Unified Framework for Roadway Safety
How can transportation professionals determine which safety strategies to prioritize? The Unified Framework for Safe System Implementation brings decades of safety research together to help agencies make more informed decisions. By connecting exposure, severity, and crash likelihood to different roadway contexts, the framework offers a practical way to prioritize strategies across planning, policy, design, and operations.
Meeting the Deadline Isn’t the Same as Solving the Problem
New state requirements are changing how cities approach truck route planning, but meeting a deadline doesn’t necessarily resolve conflicts between freight movement and neighborhood needs. See how Jurupa Valley used truck data, community input, and clear evaluation criteria to rethink its truck network, meet California’s AB 98 requirements, and reduce truck traffic exposure in sensitive areas.
Cathleen Sullivan Joins Fehr & Peers
Our new Principal Cathleen Sullivan brings a practical, people-centered approach to transit and multimodal planning, helping Bay Area agencies turn complex ideas into progress.






