Announcing Safety Multipliers
Working on these case studies clarified something we have been seeing in our own projects for a while. The cases that produced the most durable safety gains were not the ones that pulled the hardest on a single lever. They were the ones where an intervention package pulled all three at once, with each component making the others work harder.
We are calling that pattern a safety multiplier. San Francisco’s Van Ness BRT is a useful example: a transit-only lane that simultaneously reduced vehicle volumes, slowed remaining traffic, removed conflict points, and improved emergency response. One project, multiple wins reinforcing each other.
We have put together a page that explains the multiplier concept, walks through Van Ness to illustrate it, and catalogs eleven other multipliers we have been tracking such as congestion pricing, road diet or road reconfiguration packages, Safe Wave signal timing, Safe Routes to School networks, and others. It includes a quick-reference table showing which lever each one emphasizes, so a decision maker can select from the best fitting ideas for their local context.
share this article
Connect with our Contributors
Explore More
VMT Mitigation Lexicon
If you’ve ever paused mid-CEQA draft to ask “what do we mean by this, exactly?”, our new VMT Mitigation Lexicon is for you.
What Is Downtown DC For?
The DC decongestion pricing study landed years late in a city that looks nothing like the one it studied. What is the debate really about?
Coordinating the Curb, Not Just Reacting to It
Walnut Creek’s curbside management plan took them from reactive fixes to a more coordinated, goal-driven framework for their suburban downtown. Here’s what changed, and what other agencies can learn from it.







