Equity & Infrastructure Improvements
Equity & Infrastructure Improvements
Large-scale public infrastructure projects are intended to better the lives of community members and roadway users. These projects have the potential to transform corridors with investment levels of each project reaching into the hundreds of millions. The goal of this investment is to benefit travelers and local communities: faster and more reliable travel times, new multimodal travel choices, and fewer collisions. But does current practice evaluate which community members and roadway users are actually benefitting from these large-scale projects?
To answer this question, we have conducted a case study in the Sacramento region of California that showcases how activity-based models (ABM) can be used for transportation equity analysis. This study finds that ABMs can be used to better understand the sociodemographic characteristics of travelers who are likely to benefit from specific large-scale infrastructure projects.
Sacramento Region Case Study
Sacramento Region Infrastructure Projects
The Sacramento region for this evaluation consists of six counties in Northern California: El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba. Areas considered primarily low-income are highlighted on the map below. The chart beneath the map lists the five most expensive future roadway infrastructure investments planned for the Sacramento region listed in the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan /Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS). These projects have a total investment of $1,641,500,000.
ABM Methodology
Methodology
In transportation planning, ABMs simulate people’s daily activities and travel patterns. These models predict the amount and characteristics of roadway users. Using the SACOG SACSIM19 and Replica ABMs, we analyzed the following key characteristics of travelers assigned to each of the above projects.
- Traveler Origins & Destinations
- Age, Race, Gender, and Income Distribution
When we compare the demographic characteristics of travelers by each project, and then to regional averages, we see more clearly who infrastructure dollars are benefiting. These models can also be used to analyze how increased vehicle travel impacts adjacent communities using metrics such as VMT exposure per capita.
Equity Effects
SACSIM and Replica Model Results
This Sacramento region case study uses two ABMs to identify income distribution of travelers for the five projects based on tracking individual travelers that use the improved roadways. Each traveler on the improved network is identified and then their travel path from origin to destination is tracked. This allows demographic information associated with the traveler to be determined. These users of the managed lanes or new roadway connection are the ones most directly benefitting from the projects. The analysis results are summarized and illustrated below.
- The SACSIM19 model shows that travelers with higher average household incomes are likely to benefit from three of the five projects (I-80, I-5, and Broadway Bridge). The other projects’ travelers were shown to have similar household incomes compared to the regional average.
- The Replica model example indicates that those with higher average household incomes are most likely to benefit from all five of the SACOG projects.
What This Means For Future Projects
This study has a wide range of potential applications for public agencies for allocating public funding in an equitable manner including prioritizing projects with more equitable outcome.
Evaluation of race, gender, and age of travelers can reveal more about the planned transportation systems and how they may improve communities.
share this article
Explore More
New NCHRP Toolkit Helps Agencies Build Safety Into Everyday Decisions
Making streets safer takes more than individual projects. Our new Safe System approach toolkit, developed through NCHRP Research Report 1181, helps agencies integrate safety into policies, budgets, design standards, and land use decisions. Explore practical tools, real-world case studies, and new IIHS Safe System success stories that show how agencies are turning safety into standard practice.
Announcing Safety Multipliers
What do San Francisco’s Van Ness BRT, New York’s congestion pricing, and Arlington’s intersection program have in common? Each pulls all three Safe System levers at once. We call that pattern a safety multiplier.
Marissa Aho Joins Fehr & Peers
As climate risk reshapes transportation planning, public agencies need strategies that connect resilience with everyday investment decisions. Marissa Aho, FAICP, brings decades of experience helping cities and regions turn climate risk into practical, fundable actions. Learn how her leadership expands our climate adaptation and resilience practice and strengthens the support we provide to communities.