Street Safety in an Autonomous Vehicle Future

 

Merging Autonomous Vehicles into the Safe System Approach
October 8, 2021
First page of Autonomous Vehicle Considerations under the Safe System Approach ITE report

Street Safety in an Autonomous Vehicle Future

 

Merging Autonomous Vehicles into the Safe System Approach
October 8, 2021

In contrast to more traditional roadway safety approaches, the Safe System approach strives to design and operate our vehicles and infrastructure in a manner that anticipates human error and accommodates human injury tolerances with a goal of eliminating fatal and serious injuries. By automating vehicle speed regulation, improving reaction times, and reducing or eliminating the incidence of distracted and/or impaired driving, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to support several core elements of the Safe System approach. However, recent trends in traffic-related pedestrian deaths and speeding-related collisions raise increasing concerns and a need for transportation professionals to work with policymakers and vehicle companies toward policy, legislation, and vehicle/software design that create safe AVs—and safe streets to operate them on.

As a direct result of these alarming trends and uncertainty regarding the potential impacts of AVs on safety outcomes, Fehr & Peers partnered with ITE to publish “Autonomous Vehicle Considerations under a Safe System Framework,” which provides a concise summary of potential AV benefits, risks, and other considerations within the Safe System framework. For a more detailed look at street safety considerations for an AV future, we invite you to explore the ITE “Quick Bite.” The article highlights how transportation engineers and planners can design roadways taking “evergreen” safety principles into account, both for today and in the future.

share this article

Explore More

Still Getting Trip Generation Right: Revalidating MXD+

Still Getting Trip Generation Right: Revalidating MXD+

State-of-the-practice analytical methods should be employed when estimating the trip generation of mixed-use projects. In the latest issue of the American Planning Association’s PAS Memo, John Gard and Corwin Bell of Fehr & Peers describe the advantages, analysis techniques, and use of MXD+ through actual site case studies.

Infrastructure Projects & Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Infrastructure Projects & Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Can freeway infrastructure projects have a greenhouse gas emission benefit by improving travel speeds and reducing tailpipe emissions? Explore the corridor level results of three project case studies using different modeling approaches.