Rethinking Street Design for Safety and Emergency Access
Rethinking Street Design for Safety and Emergency Access
Cities want neighborhood streets that are safe, livable, and ready for emergencies. But in practice, those priorities don’t always align. Rigid standards and siloed decision-making can push communities toward wider streets that increase speeds, raise long-term costs, and limit space for housing and neighborhood amenities.
This February 2026 ITE Journal article, “Safer Streets Through Abundance: Aligning Fire Codes, Safety, and Community Goals,” looks at a different path forward: connected street networks that give emergency responders multiple routes, and early collaboration between fire, transportation, planning, and public health teams.
When departments work together from the start, communities can move beyond one-size-fits-all standards and design residential streets that support both emergency response and everyday safety.
Contact us to explore how your community can balance emergency access with safer, more sustainable neighborhood design.
share this article
Contributor
Matt Goyne
Principal
Email Me
Explore More
VMT Implementation Steps
Compare the implementation of VMT Banks, VMT Exchanges, and VMT Impact Fee Programs through practical flowcharts outlining key decisions, legal requirements, agency coordination, environmental review, and long-term administration. This resource helps public agencies, regional partners, and development teams evaluate which VMT mitigation approach best fits their community’s goals.
What Seattle’s Travel Trends Reveal About Post-Pandemic Mobility
The 2023 Puget Sound travel study revealed notable changes in how people get around. Our team identified emerging trends that may hold lessons for other regions.
The Ws of Safety: Treating the System, Not the Symptom
Our safety experts propose a Ws framework (who, what, when, where, and why) to strengthen the Safe System Approach and achieve Vision Zero 2.0.





