Announcing Safety Multipliers
Originally published May 18, 2026. Updated to include links to published Safe System Institutionalization Toolkit and Safe System Success Stories.
Two collections of Safe System case studies are landing this summer. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, in partnership with the University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the Vision Zero Network, SafeTREC at UC Berkeley, and Fehr & Peers as a co-sponsor, will release a compendium of Safe System case studies at the ITE International Conference in Detroit (now available here). A second collection appears in the NCHRP 08-171 Safe System Institutionalization Toolkit, releasing in June (now available here). Both efforts trace projects that have measurably reduced crash injury risk through the three levers of the Safe System Approach: exposure, severity, and likelihood.
Working on these case studies clarified something we have been seeing in our own projects for a while. The cases that produced the most durable safety gains were not the ones that pulled the hardest on a single lever. They were the ones where an intervention package pulled all three at once, with each component making the others work harder.
We are calling that pattern a safety multiplier. San Francisco’s Van Ness BRT is a useful example: a transit-only lane that simultaneously reduced vehicle volumes, slowed remaining traffic, removed conflict points, and improved emergency response. One project, multiple wins reinforcing each other.
We have put together a page that explains the multiplier concept, walks through Van Ness to illustrate it, and catalogs eleven other multipliers we have been tracking such as congestion pricing, road diet or road reconfiguration packages, Safe Wave signal timing, Safe Routes to School networks, and others. It includes a quick-reference table showing which lever each one emphasizes, so a decision maker can select from the best fitting ideas for their local context.
share this article
Connect with our Contributors
Explore More
Bike & Bus Interaction on Our Streets
Bus operators and people on bikes often share road space, travel at similar speeds, and have very different sizes, making moving easily and safely an ongoing challenge. We recently partnered with LA Metro on a comprehensive review of bike/bus interactions in LA County, and together, developed a set of design and education recommendations that can help and may be applied anywhere in the United States. Take a look!
Recalibrating Our MXD Tool for Mixed-Use Trip Generation
This white paper outlines how our MXD modeling tool was recalibrated and validated with recent travel data and conditions.
Cincinnati Strategic Transit Study
Check out the study to better understand how demand-responsive transportation services (ride-hailing, flexible transit) currently fit into the Cincinnati transportation system and their potential role to complement fixed-route transit services.








